Can ‘carbon money’ solve the climate problem?

Dealing with climate change can seem extremely costly. In all accounts, payments will be billions of dollars every year for many years to come.

Until now, the efforts have been unpleasant and painful. Washington is temporarily working on top ropes to fund billions of dollars, a climate-focused package that could make or break Uncle Sam\’s attempt to eliminate decarbonisation.

Very low-income investments are difficult. To date, rich countries pledging to finance the climate costs of poor countries – up to $ 100 billion a year – remain unfulfilled after a decade. The toughest challenges and the highest costs are still ahead, so expectations look bleak.

What if there was a way we could pay for climate change by building a new world currency, without the books of national and corporate accounts?

This money can be used to leak every ton of depleted carbon, be it clean energy, clean business or direct carbon emissions and land restitution. Such a state would not only transform public and private investments. It can also pay to protect the environment, which today is struggling to find funding. This regime will also undergo political changes. Company boards and policy makers can switch from fundraising to planning.

From today\’s very wall-mounted system – taxes and regulations – the reward will encourage decarbonization (carrots). Just like humans, the world\’s economic systems are changing rapidly with a mixture of carrots and sticks.

If any of this sounds familiar, the same program plays a major role in Kim Stanley Robinson\’s recent work on weather legends, The Ministry for the future, a novel featured as a study by Barack Obama and Ezra Klein, among others.

In fact, as the climate crisis worsens, the world\’s top central banks are moving from cautionary ties to emergency cooperation to create a \”cash square\” of carbon to support decarbonisation emissions. Robinson\’s name explores the inspiration of this financial solution as \”Chen paper.\”

Chen’s educational roots begin in Australia with a Ph.D. in engineering. About 2013, he focused on examining the obstacles to climate change. Clearly, as science has shown, economics has emerged as a major problem. Something was missing.

At the highest level, he describes the global economy as an incomplete system, losing valuable value – at risk – that could help solve the climate problem. Activists like Greta Thunberg, says Chen, say that we now have all the facts and solutions to the climate crisis: “I say that\’s not true. We do not have all the answers because the basic economics of carbon prices seem incomplete. ”

That new money is being used to pay for Global Carbon Rewards rewards, a flow of incentives to support permanent funding to reduce greenhouse gases.

Chen\’s idea is complex, and much of it exceeds my financial smoothness – for more details, see the links at the end of this note. That said, its high-quality features are accessible and link to real world development.


Carbon Money. One would not use Chen\’s carbon coin daily to buy food or gas. Instead, each visible coin is \”struck\” based on the number of metric tons of CO2 reduced for a century. Central banks will manage the conversion rate – in dollars, Euros, renminbi, etc. – annual notice.

Because of its rising value, the coin creates a reliable price signal to help companies pay for more expensive conversion programs – such as the transition from oil to crude hydrogen – that is difficult to finance today with no future carbon emissions.

Governance and knowledge. This plan will require the replacement of existing facilities and the construction of new ones. Long-term decisions about setting a target for the currency will be made by an official, led by a global cost-cutting curve. As the value of the coin increases, year by year, markets will have a growing incentive to cope with the growing challenges of money laundering.

To manage the issuance of coins, the plan will include registering registers, tracking global claims for carbon reduction to avoid double counting and related harassment. Such a library of methods and success promises other benefits, too: an open source storage space for best practices to speed up mitigation.

Social benefits. Modern carbon frameworks are highly prone to inflation in the most severe damage to human, cultural, and ecological systems – from extinction to deforestation. As part of the coin management program, participants – from indigenous peoples to environmentalists – would contribute to the balance of prize allocations.

They preceded him
As Chen\’s plans get the attention, real world financial trends go the same way:

Central bank. Chen\’s CQE is based on a portion of the emergence of a reduction in price (QE) around 2008. In response to the tax evasion problem, the Federal Reserve adopted a new approach at the time, which – at the risk of being overcrowded – allowed major banks to issue new debt with one hand while buying it with another, thus building new assets, and keeping debt in jeopardy.

Critics are clamoring for a new tsunami. They were wrong. And since then, QE has become a favorite of the world\’s largest banks. To date, they have taken more than $ 25 trillion in QE funds from the global economy, including another $ 9 trillion in response to the economic crisis of COVID-19, per Atlantic Council.

At a few billion dollars a year, the QE river already in the ballpark is the expected price tag for climate change. And as major banks adopt this approach, they are beginning to streamline efforts.

Separated to maintain financial stability, sometimes measured by unemployment and inflation, central banks began to look at the climate with the same framework, Chen said. Since the full protection of mortgage lenders in 2008, it is not a long way to go to think that banks view the collapse of the climate as a fundamental risk to the system.

There are early signs of this change. The Network of Central Banks and Supervisors for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), launched in 2017, is a group of more than 80 major banks and executives, including the Federal Reserve. In addition to advancing financial sector practices surrounding climate risk management, members of the NGFS are working to \”integrate general finance to support change towards a sustainable economy.\”

Verification. The elements needed to secure the world\’s carbon footprint also meet. Such a state will need a reliable technology platform to monitor and track carbon emissions remotely in order to allocate payments.

Verification technology is expanding rapidly. Startups like NCX today use satellite imaging and AI processing to make better money with carbon credits. A new generation of satellites capable of remotely detecting CO2 emissions is already releasing previously unknown mega sources of GHGs. And these same programs can also signal the growth of greenhouse gas CO2.

Meanwhile, the technical infrastructure and carbon offset tracking control – albeit imperfect – is improving. In North America alone, a dozen or more segments have emerged, including the Alberta Emission Offset System Registry and the California Air Resources Board.

The first steps in global integration are there, says Frank Van Gansbeke, a professor of practice at Middlebury College, with a strong focus on financial markets and major markets. Although he has improved his career without Chen, the two now regularly review and discuss progress.

Where Chen understands the financial crisis as a foreign scientist, Van Gansbeke comes to it as a former investor, with a strong focus on working with existing financial institutions. He considers that the planet’s limited range holds the main goal of monetary policy, in which all other debt instruments must be traded.

Van Gansbeke identifies Special Drawing Rights as a possible prelude. Created in 1969 by the International Monetary Fund, as a currency meta, the IMF uses the SDRs today to fund a world economy that meets trade equity or other economic challenges.

Used in conjunction with other stocks in the IMF balance, SDRs can be used as collateral to create a climate currency. Designed for anchor money, the IMF unit will be a \”solidcoin\”: a blockchain-backed fund based on part of real estate and forestry, new meteorological enterprises and 150 ESG-based leading companies.

With the release of the changed currency, says Van Gansbeke, the IMF has the capacity and expertise to take this step. With a third-party guaranteed GHG discount, emerging market countries will receive payments on IMF coins.

The proceeds can be used as collateral, as a means of paying off debts or as a debt repayment tool or for foreign exchange interventions. The IMF climate currency not only provides strong price signals in all segments of the market, but will also facilitate the planned allocation of carbon.

What\’s next?
Can carbon money jump from the science team to reality? When Chen\’s autopsy was published a few years ago, it may have been easier to move it as an in-depth study of the wishes.

But over the years, a lot has changed: climate urgency is on the rise and the financial zeitgeist is changing, as economists and financiers think of something that would never happen, such as creating billions of dollars.

Rewriting the rules of the global economy to manage dangerous change is not all that unusual, either. In the 20th century, it happened twice: once, with the 44-nation agreement at Bretton Woods to rebuild the world economy after World War II; and again, in the 1970s, with a change in the level of gold. Today, rising digital currencies and the growing risk of climate change are so disruptive that another moment of change seems impossible.

Both Chen and Van Gansbeke are moving forward with plans to implement them.

At COP26 to be held in Glasgow, Van Gansbeke and a team of financial experts will announce the Rethinking Bretton Woods program, where climate funding will be a clue.

Personally, Chen is focused on testing. His nonprofit seeks funding and grants to build a conceptual evidence show in California. The demo will involve a few other countries and will take a few years to demonstrate various technical expertise. Big banks are not important in this study, Chen said, because their financial role will be imitated.

In the field of carbon money, the truth is beginning to overwhelm the idea, as Kim Stanley Robinson put it in an interview with Bill McKibben:

As fast as it grows, the sustainable investment industry is too young to drive global transformation into a low-carbon economy, the IMF notes in its annual Global Financial Stability Report. To help it grow, governments must do more to protect investors from being deceived by greenhashing, the report finds. Climate-based investment investments remain the backbone of all investment investments: by the end of 2020, label-based investments will be 7 percent, or $ 252 billion, of $ 3.6 trillion in total assets.

Many investors are ready to join that lake. According to a recent FTSE Russell review of Sustainable Investment: 2021 Global Survey findings from asset owners, 84 percent of asset owners use or assess the sustainability of their portfolios. Likewise, most property owners are paying close attention to the principles of sustainable investment.

Rulers also go that way. As the optional commitment to decarbonisation increases and the pressure on investors increases, so do the requirements of clear standards. And now executives at large companies on the list are asking the Financial Accounting Standards Board to set accounting rules for ESG issues.

Meanwhile, across Capitol Hill, US Securities and Exchange Commission chairman Gary Gensler has presented evidence that the SEC is considering filing for companies to report their gas emissions.

Led by the Carbon Disclosure Project, the collection of 220 investors with more than $ 30 trillion in assets has required 1,600 companies to set science-based goals. Properly aligned with the Paris objectives, the SBTs are very robust, including emissions from scales 1, 2, and difficult to manage 3. Last year, CDP\’s push put 150 companies to commit to SBTs. Those who typically cut emissions by 6.4 percent per year, above the required level to reach the Paris target of 1.5 ° C.

Talking about 3 complex management objectives: The bevy of large companies has announced a net-zero commitment, including their scales. Fast food giant McDonald\’s and Mars, a UK confectioner and animal feed maker, are joined by a steel producer and cement maker from the ground up.

The product features form a large 3-piece unit in most companies. It follows that many firms are focusing on the challenges posed by their connections, especially after the disruption associated with the purchase of COVID-19. More than half of the executives surveyed said their firms prioritized funding for the distribution of purchases, according to a study released by research firm Verdantix.

Autodesk\’s largest software and design software has released its first solidarity bond, estimated at $ 1 billion. The San Rafael (Calif.) Company has also announced that it has achieved greenhouse gas emissions throughout its business and price list for the first time in the 2021 financial year.

Bloomberg Green is celebrating 10 years of the \”Carbon Bubble,\” a remarkable report among the first to link the planet\’s limited global budget and the growing risk that petrol players will face falling commodity prices. \”A lot of what she warned about has already happened,\” remarked Kate McKenzie. Even Exxon has had to write down the number of its repositories. ”

This includes a way to filter aircraft with carbon emissions and new map features that cause congestion and road inclination to help truck drivers use less fuel.

Leave a Comment