What areas are most resilient to climate change?
There may be no place to go to avoid the effects of changing weather, but some areas are better located and prepared for record temperatures, rising sea levels and making natural disasters worse than others. The US Environmental Protection Agency has developed the Climate Resilience Screening Index to measure local resilience to climate change and natural disasters, and the latest report was published in August 2020. The EPA has counted CRSI scores in all US states by rating. each society with resilience based on five categories: risk, governance, community, structured environment and natural environment. Determining which 150 metropolitan areas are at the U.S. level News Best Places to Live The situation is further strengthened based on EPA data (with the exception of San Juan, Puerto Rico), we estimate the values of all the regions that make up the given road areas. Keep learning to find out what places you can consider living in if you are worried about climate change.
1. Anchorage, Alaska
The city of Anchorage has the highest CRSI scores for all the Best Places to Live street lists, because most of the city is undeveloped and deserted. The natural environment is more resilient to the weather than the metropolitan area and can adapt to changes in sea levels or temperatures. With a small population and man-made infrastructure, there are few things to keep in place, allowing the desert to respond naturally to climate change.
The EPA report notes that conservation of natural resources is a strong contribution to many high-score regions, and this is certainly the case in Hawaii. Honolulu benefits from national efforts to reduce the likelihood of invasive species invading the environment. Of course, the Honolulu Municipality area is prone to seasonal storms and hurricanes, but major damage or destruction is not uncommon in Hawaii due in part to the cold water temperatures and the high-pressure system northeast of the islands that prevent many major storms. Living in Honolulu is expensive, however: It is the eighth most expensive place to live in 150 densely populated areas in the U.S.
3. Spokane, Washington
Spokane is another municipal area that benefits from its remote area. An EPA report points out that rising sea levels and erosion are major risks to infrastructure in the Pacific Northwest, but Spokane\’s location on the east side of Washington means avoiding this particular threat. But like most of the Pacific Northwest, Spokane is in danger of future glaciers from the mountains of Washington and Montana as temperatures rise worldwide.
4. Eugene, Oregon
In No. 4 on the list of best places to stay if you are concerned about climate change is Eugene, which is part of a small population of Oregon who tolerates less risk than Portland or Salem. Apart from the fact that the regions that make up Eugene have a very high CRSI rate of 8.49, this area is specifically named in the EPA report as enduring severe drought and severe wildfires over the years.
5. Santa Barbara, California
Located along the coast and south of the Los Padres National Forest, Santa Barbara could be seen as an unexpected addition to the list, given the threat of wildfires in Southern California. However, the city is taking a proactive approach to climate change and emerging climate events and natural hazards. The Santa Barbara climate action plan aims to identify major sources of carbon emissions in the community, develop strategies to curb such emissions and work hard to create a more sustainable environment. In 2020, the city council adopted a policy of carbon neutrality by 2035.
6. Tucson, Arizona
The desert lands of Tucson have never been more populous, with high temperatures during the day and cold nights that can make genetic exposure dangerous. But when it comes to the dangers of major weather events affecting the area, Tucson is considered to be tolerant. Local infrastructure is expected to be able to withstand weather events, and conservation efforts are almost on par with the rest of the U.S.
7. Albuquerque, New Mexico
Albuquerque\’s climate is best described as a mountain range: the air is dry, and desert flowers are prominent throughout the metropolitan area, located at an altitude of 15,500 feet [5,312 m]. Extreme heat, drought, insect outbreaks, and wildfires are dangerous in the city, and such events could lead to power shortages in the future. But small man-made infrastructure is located in key areas where fires are likely to cause destruction, and Albuquerque has a growing natural habitat that does not rely on humans to take care of itself.
8. Portland, Maine
The biggest threats to the Northeast are rising sea levels, heat waves and heavy rainfall, which could jeopardize local infrastructure, agriculture and the fishing industry. The natural environment in the suburbs of Portland, combined with local government efforts to conserve natural resources, establish a system and rehabilitate residents, helps increase the CRSI area of Portland compared to most of the southern Atlantic coastal regions.
9. Green Bay, Wisconsin
Like other major countries in the Great Lakes, the Green Bay metropolitan area has higher rates than many other parts of the United States in terms of government efforts to curb negative environmental impacts and better prepare for climate change. The entire region receives a CR7 rating of 5.76 from the EPA, which is higher than the national average – Green Bay, as the smallest municipal area in the sparsely populated area of Wisconsin, has the highest figures at 6.31, estimated at regional per capita.
10. Boise, Idaho
The EPA study places Boise within the Pacific Northwest region which includes Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Wildfires, tree diseases, rising sea levels, erosion and melting of snow threaten the region in general, but the central Idaho region helps eliminate some of the most serious threats to the coast of Oregon, Washington and Alaska. In addition, the area around the Boise ecosystem has teamed up with an active local government, which works to reduce human impact and prepare for climate change, making Boise No. 10 on this list.
11. Reno, iNvada
Reno\’s area in the southwest is threatened by extreme heat, drought, insect outbreaks, and wildfires. However, Reno appears to be at a much lower risk of these events compared to much of Southern California, and has effective environmental conservation efforts aimed at conserving the environment and increasing sustainability. As a suburb of less than 500,000 people bordering the Nevada border with Northern California, Reno also benefits from an extended natural environment that does not require human conservation, making it more tolerant of extreme weather or other environmental events caused by climate change.
12. Las Vegas
Not surprisingly, southern Nevada is at risk of global warming, but Las Vegas is more resilient to climate change than other US states. In addition, local and national governments are playing a significant role in conserving the environment, although the local economy suffered a setback in 2020 due to the decline in tourism due to the COVID-19 epidemic.
13. Rochester, New York
In upstate New York, Rochester benefits from being off the coast, has effective conservation efforts and is located in the midst of a wide range of environments that should help it cope with major weather events, natural disasters, and extreme weather. Rising temperatures and droughts are a real concern in the Rochester area and the rest of the region including New York and New Jersey, but very low temperatures are also dangerous for citizens to be prepared for.
14. Salem, Oregon
Like the rest of the West Coast, residents of the Salem area should be concerned about the increasing threat of wildfires, as well as rising temperatures, droughts, heavy rains and floods and more. Compared to the densely populated Portland, Oregon, in the north, Salem has less infrastructure to worry about and the more natural environment of the city and its suburbs, helping to increase its resilience to climate change, climate change and increasing natural disasters.
15. Kansas City, Missouri
Located on the Kansas-Missouri border, the Kansas Municipal area is at risk of rising temperatures, which could threaten future water and energy supply. However, the state of agriculture in the region also means that districts in the suburbs of Kansas City on the outskirts of the city have a lower level of infrastructure threat, although more farming reduces the number of untouched natural areas. The EPA reports that the most co-operative efforts in the region, made by Iowa, Kansas, Missouri and Nebraska, are focused on ensuring water availability.